MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163582188 · doi:10.5380/cam.v4i0.1596

O Saber é Estranho e Amargo - Sociologia e mitologia do conhecimento entre os Yaminawa

2003· article· pt· W2163582188 on OpenAlexaff
Óscar Calavia Sáez, Miguel Carid Naveira, Laura Pérez Gil

Bibliographic record

VenueCAMPOS - Revista de Antropologia Social · 2003
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologySociologyHumanitiesValue (mathematics)IndigenousPhilosophyTheologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo, baseado em pesquisa de campo entre vários grupos indígenas de língua Pano –Yaminawa e Yawanawaocupa- se das idéias locais a respeito do conhecimento, do seu valor, da sua distribuição e transmissão, a partir, sobretudo, do comentário de alguns mitos. Para além de um saber cotidiano e não marcado que é transmitido informalmente pelos mesmos canais que criam o dia a dia da aldeia (especialmente a troca de alimentos) existe um outro saber marcado –cuja máxima expressão é o xamanismo, baseado na ingestão de substâncias amargasque pelo contrário é objeto de apropriação e riqueza não necessariamente compartilhada, e que só é obtido por meios difíceis e negociados. A diferença entre esses dois tipos de saber esclarece algumas características da estrutura destas sociedades, e também levanta questões importantes a respeito da gestão dos saberes tradicionais no âmbito global. Knowledge is strange and bitter. Sociology and mythology of Yaminawa knowledge Abstract This article, based on fieldwork among various indigenous groups speakers of Panoan language – Yaminawa and Yawanawa – focuses on local ideas regarding knowledge, its value, distribution and transmission, its perspective standing mainly from the commentary of some myths. Beyond an everyday knowledge which is unmarked and informally transmitted by the same channels that make up the village’s daily life (specially the exchange of food), there is another form of knowledge that is marked – whose most important expression is shamanism, based on the ingestion of bitter substances – and which is, on the contrary, the object of appropriation and wealth which is not necessarily shared, and which is only obtained through difficult and negotiated means. The difference between these two types of knowledge explains some characteristics of the structure of these societies and also raises important questions related concerning the management of traditional knowledges at the local level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAMPOS - Revista de Antropologia SocialSame topicIndigenous Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207