O Saber é Estranho e Amargo - Sociologia e mitologia do conhecimento entre os Yaminawa
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo, baseado em pesquisa de campo entre vários grupos indígenas de língua Pano Yaminawa e Yawanawaocupa- se das idéias locais a respeito do conhecimento, do seu valor, da sua distribuição e transmissão, a partir, sobretudo, do comentário de alguns mitos. Para além de um saber cotidiano e não marcado que é transmitido informalmente pelos mesmos canais que criam o dia a dia da aldeia (especialmente a troca de alimentos) existe um outro saber marcado cuja máxima expressão é o xamanismo, baseado na ingestão de substâncias amargasque pelo contrário é objeto de apropriação e riqueza não necessariamente compartilhada, e que só é obtido por meios difíceis e negociados. A diferença entre esses dois tipos de saber esclarece algumas características da estrutura destas sociedades, e também levanta questões importantes a respeito da gestão dos saberes tradicionais no âmbito global. Knowledge is strange and bitter. Sociology and mythology of Yaminawa knowledge Abstract This article, based on fieldwork among various indigenous groups speakers of Panoan language Yaminawa and Yawanawa focuses on local ideas regarding knowledge, its value, distribution and transmission, its perspective standing mainly from the commentary of some myths. Beyond an everyday knowledge which is unmarked and informally transmitted by the same channels that make up the villages daily life (specially the exchange of food), there is another form of knowledge that is marked whose most important expression is shamanism, based on the ingestion of bitter substances and which is, on the contrary, the object of appropriation and wealth which is not necessarily shared, and which is only obtained through difficult and negotiated means. The difference between these two types of knowledge explains some characteristics of the structure of these societies and also raises important questions related concerning the management of traditional knowledges at the local level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it