MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163662039 · doi:10.1101/lm.469707

Isoform specificity of protein kinase Cs in synaptic plasticity

2007· review· en· W2163662039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueLearning & Memory · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGene isoformProtein kinase CSynaptic plasticityNeuroscienceNeurotransmitterBiologyAplysiaNeuroplasticityNeurotransmissionCell biologyChemistryKinaseBiochemistryCentral nervous systemReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protein kinase Cs (PKCs) are implicated in many forms of synaptic plasticity. However, the specific isoform(s) of PKC that underlie(s) these events are often not known. We have used Aplysia as a model system in order to investigate the isoform specificity of PKC actions due to the presence of fewer isoforms and a large number of documented physiological roles for PKC in synaptic plasticity in this system. In particular, we have shown that distinct isoforms mediate distinct types of synaptic plasticity induced by the same neurotransmitter: The novel calcium-independent PKC Apl II is required for actions mediated by serotonin (5-HT) alone, while the classical calcium-dependent PKC Apl I is required for actions mediated when 5-HT is coupled to activity. We will discuss the reasons for PKC isoform specificity, assess the tools used to uncover isoform specificity, and discuss the implications of isoform specificity for understanding the roles of PKC in regulating synaptic plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it