Parametric Modeling of Microwave Passive Components Using Sensitivity-Analysis-Based Adjoint Neural-Network Technique
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel sensitivity-analysis-based adjoint neural-network (SAANN) technique to develop parametric models of microwave passive components. This technique allows robust parametric model development by learning not only the input-output behavior of the modeling problem, but also derivatives obtained from electromagnetic (EM) sensitivity analysis. A novel derivation is introduced to allow complicated high-order derivatives to be computed by a simple artificial neural-network (ANN) forward-back propagation procedure. New formulations are deduced for exact second-order sensitivity analysis of general multilayer neural-network structures with any numbers of layers and hidden neurons. Compared to our previous work on adjoint neural networks, the proposed SAANN is easier to implement into an existing ANN structure. The proposed technique allows us to obtain accurate and parametric models with less training data. Another benefit of this technique is that the trained model can accurately predict derivatives to geometrical or material parameters, regardless of whether or not these parameters are accommodated as sensitivity variables in EM simulators. Once trained, the SAANN models provide accurate and fast prediction of EM responses and derivatives used for high-level optimization with geometrical or material parameters as design variables. Three examples including parametric modeling of coupled-line filters, cavity filters, and junctions are presented to demonstrate the validity of this technique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it