MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2163923719 · doi:10.1109/tns.2013.2250307

Design of a Real-Time FPGA-Based Data Acquisition Architecture for the LabPET II: An APD-Based Scanner Dedicated to Small Animal PET Imaging

2013· article· en· W2163923719 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionComputer hardwareField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceDetectorApplication-specific integrated circuitThroughputReal-time computingWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The LabPET II detector block was designed to achieve submillimeter spatial resolution in small animal PET imaging. Each detection block consists of two arrays of 4 × 8 avalanche photodiodes (APD) individually coupled to an 8 × 8 scintillator array, to form 64 independent detectors with parallel readout channels. This new detection block entails an eightfold increase in pixel density compared to the LabPET I. A 64-channel mixed-signal application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) was designed to extract relevant PET data in real time from the LabPET II detection blocks. In order to interface the ASICs forming the PET camera with the storage units, a real-time FPGA-based digital data acquisition (DAQ) system was designed. The DAQ system allows event harvesting, processing and transmission to a host computer for data storage as well as system programming and calibration. Real-time event processing embedded in the DAQ includes time trigger, energy computation using a time-over-threshold (TOT) conversion scheme, timing corrections, and event sorting trees. In the standard DAQ mode, a real-time coincidence engine analyzes events and only keeps relevant information to minimize data throughput and post-acquisition data processing. The architecture consists of three FPGA-based electronic layers wired through gigabit links: a Front-End layer extracts time and energy along with the pixel address, a custom Hub layer chronologically sorts incoming events, and a Coincidence engine matches coincident events and computes an estimate of the random events rate. Every FPGA in the different layers is accessible through an Ethernet link. The real-time digital architecture sustains the required throughput of ~ 111 million events/s for a ~ 37000-channel scanner configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it