MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sex and Gender Discrepancies in Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes Among Patients With Established Coronary Artery Disease

2008· article· en· W2164099035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineAnginaCoronary artery diseaseQuality of life (healthcare)Canadian Cardiovascular SocietyCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression ScaleConfoundingDepression (economics)EpidemiologySocial supportDiseaseMental healthSF-36Physical therapyGerontologyInternal medicineHealth related quality of lifeDepressive symptomsPsychiatryAnxietyMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Although eradicating discrepancies in health is of unquestioned importance, there are few studies examining health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among men and women with coronary artery disease (CAD), a highly prevalent and morbid condition among industrialized nations. This study compares the HRQOL outcomes of men and women in Alberta, Canada, 1 year after the documentation of coronary artery disease by cardiac catheterization. METHOD AND RESULTS: Patients' disease-specific HRQOL was assessed 1 year after angiography using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, whereas their generic health status, burden of depressive symptoms, and social support were respectively quantified with the EuroQol EQ-5D, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (short form), and the Medical Outcomes Study social support scale. The latter 2 instruments were used to adjust Seattle Angina Questionnaire outcomes for potential confounding characteristics hypothesized to be associated with sex and gender. General linear modeling and a change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores from baseline to 1 year were used to compare the HRQOL outcomes of men and women, after adjusting for demographics, clinical factors, depressive symptoms, and social support differences between groups. A total of 2394 (60% of those eligible) patients responded to the baseline and the 1-year follow-up survey. The adjusted mean 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores were significantly higher in men when compared with women, even after adjustment for all clinical factors, social support, depressive symptoms, and baseline HRQOL scales. Not only were women noted to have worse health status at the time of angiography, but despite adjusting for these differences, residual discrepancies in 1-year health status persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Women with coronary artery disease report worse HRQOL 1 year after coronary angiography when compared with men, and the discrepancies observed are only partially accounted for by sex differences in depression and social support. As a result, the measurement of gender roles and perceptions may be the best place to persist on the quest to identifying and understanding the noted discrepancies in cardiac recovery and HRQOL outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it