Heavyweight Pattern Mining in Attributed Flow Graphs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper defines a new problem - heavyweight pattern mining in attributed flow graphs. The problem can be described as the discovery of patterns in flow graphs that have sets of attributes associated with their nodes. A connection between nodes is represented as a directed edge. The amount of load that goes through a path between nodes, or the frequency of transmission of such load between nodes, is represented as edge weights. A heavyweight pattern is a sub-set of attributes, found in a dataset of attributed flow graphs, that are connected by edges and have a computed weight higher than an user-defined threshold. A new algorithm called AFG Miner is introduced, the first one to our knowledge that finds heavyweight patterns in a dataset of attributed flow graphs and associates each pattern with its occurrences. The paper also describes a new tool for compiler engineers, HEP Miner, that applies the AFG Miner algorithm to Profile-based Program Analysis modeled as a heavyweight pattern mining problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it