MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164554221 · doi:10.1109/tce.2012.6227462

Robust video stabilization based on particle filtering with weighted feature points

2012· article· en· W2164554221 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRANSACMotion estimationArtificial intelligenceRobustness (evolution)Computer visionFeature (linguistics)Kalman filterComputer scienceMotion fieldParticle filterImage stabilizationQuarter-pixel motionMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Camera global motion estimation is critical to the success of video stabilization. This paper presents an effective and robust feature based motion estimation method. In the proposed approach, feature points are collected from input video sequences based on Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF). Random Samples Consensus (RANSAC) is used to remove local motion vectors and incorrect correspondences. In the global motion estimation, a particle filter is used to estimate the weight of feature points, solving the issue of Different Depth of Field (DDOF) for feature points. Then, the weighted least square (WLS) algorithm is applied to obtain the global motion estimation. Finally, a Kalman filter estimates the intentional motion, and the unintentional motion is compensated to obtain stable video sequences. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has the characteristics of high precision and good robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it