MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164556771 · doi:10.1137/13093769x

Linearized FE Approximations to a Nonlinear Gradient Flow

2014· article· en· W2164556771 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsIterated functionNonlinear systemFinite element methodGalerkin methodApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisSequence (biology)Discontinuous Galerkin methodFlow (mathematics)Balanced flowNumerical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study fully discrete linearized Galerkin finite element approximations to a nonlinear gradient flow, applications of which can be found in many areas. Due to the strong nonlinearity of the equation, existing analyses for implicit schemes require certain restrictions on the time step and no analysis has been explored for linearized schemes. This paper focuses on the unconditionally optimal $L^2$ error estimate of a linearized scheme. The key to our analysis is an iterated sequence of time-discrete elliptic equations and a rigorous analysis of its solution. We prove the $W^{1,\infty}$ boundedness of the solution of the time-discrete system and the corresponding finite element solution, based on a more precise estimate of elliptic PDEs in $W^{2,2+\epsilon_1}$ and $H^{2+\epsilon_2}$ and a physical feature of the gradient-dependent diffusion coefficient. Numerical examples are provided to support our theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it