MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164724325 · doi:10.1109/newcas.2010.5603920

Using a pipelined S-box in compact AES hardware implementations

2010· article· en· W2164724325 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAES implementationsComputer scienceEncryptionAdvanced Encryption StandardPipeline (software)Application-specific integrated circuitThroughputEmbedded systemImplementationComputer hardwareEncryption softwareKey (lock)Parallel computingDisk encryption40-bit encryptionOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipelined S-boxes are usually used in high speed hardware implementations of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), and not typically found in compact implementations because of the extra complexity added by the pipeline registers. In this paper, the area and speed performance of applying a pipelined S-box to compact AES hardware implementations is examined. A new compact AES encryption hardware core with 128-bit keys is proposed. The proposed design employs a single 4-stage pipelined S-box that is shared by t he data path operation and the key expansion operation. Compared with the previous smallest encryption-only ASIC implementation of AES, it achieves an increase in throughput of 2.1 times while maintaining a similar gate count. This result indicates that it is reasonable to consider using pipelined S-boxes in AES hardware implementations targeted at applications requiring low area and moderate speed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it