MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2164902176 · doi:10.1109/icpr.1990.118175

Detecting parameteric curves using the straight line Hough transform

2002· article· en· W2164902176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHough transformParametric equationLinear subspaceRepresentation (politics)Parametric statisticsAlgorithmMathematicsArc lengthTerm (time)Line (geometry)Translation (biology)Curve fittingRotation (mathematics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)GeometryArc (geometry)Statistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach for the detection of parametric curves using the straight-line Hough transform is presented. The transform function of a curve can be expressed as the sum of two terms, namely, the intrinsic term and the translation term. This representation allows a natural decomposition of the high-dimensional parameter space into three subspaces: the intrinsic curve parameters, translation, and rotation. By eliminating either the translation term or the intrinsic term, one can easily determine the parameters of the remaining term. The complexity of this method depends mainly on the angular resolution, which is relatively independent of the arc length of the curve. The computational complexity of this approach compares favorably with that of other approaches based on the Hough transform.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207