2<sup>nd</sup> Global Information Village Plaza ‐ Connecting multi‐cultural, multi‐lingual and multi‐media universes. Sponsored by SIG III, IFP
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Building on the success of the 2002 Global Information Village Plaza, this new edition maintains its interactive format (aimed at giving ASIS&T members an opportunity to express their personal views about the challenges and opportunities that the so called “information society” represents in their personal and professional lives) and adds a new multimedia dimension. New features include an edited video segment showcasing individuals and communities from around the world and the ways in which they frame the debate; another feature is the international contest for Best Graphic Art piece related to the overarching topic of the Global Information Village Plaza. Moreover, in an attempt to widen the debate, all the SIGs will be contacted and asked to submit their reflections on the issues debated. A complete web resource dedicated to the Global Information Village Plaza will be developed that includes results from the previous year's discussions; identification of recurring themes; areas where more research is needed; links to existing resources, initiatives, and policy statements. The discussion will focus on the main issues identified in the 1st Global Information Village Plaza. To keep up with the spirit of the Global Information Village Plaza, personal submission of position statements will be sought from the information professional community around the globe. The process is due to run from May through October 2003. It will include posting and discussion by those interested of short position statements on ASIST&T and other professional listservs. Selected statements will be summarized in a series of posters during a special session. During the session, participants in the Annual Meeting will be invited to first browse through the posters and comment in writing. A general discussion will later on take place. SIG/III plans to publish a summary of the process and its outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it