MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165261128 · doi:10.1002/meet.1450400167

2<sup>nd</sup> Global Information Village Plaza ‐ Connecting multi‐cultural, multi‐lingual and multi‐media universes. Sponsored by SIG III, IFP

2003· article· en· W2165261128 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia Caidi, Michel J. Menou

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb and Library Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONTESTGlobePublic relationsResource (disambiguation)SociologyPosition (finance)Library scienceWorld Wide WebMedia studiesPolitical scienceComputer scienceBusinessLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Building on the success of the 2002 Global Information Village Plaza, this new edition maintains its interactive format (aimed at giving ASIS&T members an opportunity to express their personal views about the challenges and opportunities that the so called “information society” represents in their personal and professional lives) and adds a new multimedia dimension. New features include an edited video segment showcasing individuals and communities from around the world and the ways in which they frame the debate; another feature is the international contest for Best Graphic Art piece related to the overarching topic of the Global Information Village Plaza. Moreover, in an attempt to widen the debate, all the SIGs will be contacted and asked to submit their reflections on the issues debated. A complete web resource dedicated to the Global Information Village Plaza will be developed that includes results from the previous year's discussions; identification of recurring themes; areas where more research is needed; links to existing resources, initiatives, and policy statements. The discussion will focus on the main issues identified in the 1st Global Information Village Plaza. To keep up with the spirit of the Global Information Village Plaza, personal submission of position statements will be sought from the information professional community around the globe. The process is due to run from May through October 2003. It will include posting and discussion by those interested of short position statements on ASIST&T and other professional listservs. Selected statements will be summarized in a series of posters during a special session. During the session, participants in the Annual Meeting will be invited to first browse through the posters and comment in writing. A general discussion will later on take place. SIG/III plans to publish a summary of the process and its outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3830.204

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and TechnologySame topicWeb and Library ServicesFrench-language works237,207