MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2165711042 · doi:10.1109/icc.2005.1494665

An adaptive MAC polling protocol for ethernet passive optical networks

2005· article· en· W2165711042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollingComputer networkComputer scienceNetwork packetPassive optical networkMedia access controlQuality of serviceReal-time computingWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medium access control (MAC) is one of the most crucial issues in Ethernet passive optical networks (EPONs). To prevent data of different optical network units (ONUs) from collision in the upstream direction, an EPON system must employ a MAC mechanism to arbitrate access to the shared upstream channel and at the same time efficiently share the bandwidth of the upstream channel among all ONUs. In this paper, we present an adaptive MAC polling protocol for an EPON system. This polling protocol uses an adaptive scheduling algorithm called the earliest-packet-first (EPF) algorithm that schedules the transmission order of different ONUs based on the arrival time of the first packet waiting in the queue of each ONU and always schedules the ONU with the earliest packet to transmit first in each polling. The purpose is to reduce the packet delay in the system and thus provide better quality of service for end users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207