MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W216601800

Re-Conceiving International Education: Theorizing Limits and Possibilities for Transcultural Learning/Refaçonner L'éducation Internationale: Théoriser Les Limites et Les Possibilités De L'apprentissage Transculturel

2012· book-chapter· fr· W216601800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative and international education · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPedagogyInternational educationCurriculumFraming (construction)Political scienceHigher educationPhilosophyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractThis multi-voiced paper explores the micro-level dimensions of human learning and becoming from transcultural encounters, lessons and/or curriculum under heightened transnationalism. It posits that mainstream approaches to conceptualizing the 'education' of international education lack sufficient theorization of difference, sociality, history and learning in trans-local spaces and suggests that there are expanding networks of transcultural engagements to be examined under the umbrella of international education. To explore this reconceived pedagogical landscape of international education three specific cases are presented: an auto-ethnographic reflection on coming into and making sense of one's international experience, a conceptual framing of internationalizing preservice education curriculum and a qualitative analysis of the pedagogical impacts of undergraduates' international internships. Each case illustrates the complexities, possibilities and challenges of (framing) learning and becoming in sites of transcultural engagement.ResumeCet article multi-voix cherche a refaconner le terrain pedagogique de l'« education internationale » afin de niveler les relations entre le soi et l'autre dans les espaces translocaux. Les relations entre le soi et l'autre, integrees dans le monde social, nous montrent les differences radicales qui cherchent a destabiliser le soi et a preparer le terrain qui mene a resister face a la connaissance de l'autre. A partir de cette perspective, l'« education » octroyee par une education internationale a comme but de developper et de promouvoir des pedagogies qui vont promouvoir l'acceptation des differences et l'apprentissage de et a travers la difference. Cet article presente trois cas concrets transnationaux qui explorent ce contexte pedagogique refaconne. Chaque cas offre des exemples de complexite, des possibilites mais aussi des defis quant a l'apprentissage et au devenir dans des sites de plus en plus transculturel.Keywords: international education, pedagogy, identity, transcultural learning, curriculum, internationalizing educationMots-clefs: education internationale, globalisation, pedagogie, l'identite, l'apprentissage transculturel, le curriculum, l'education internationalisationIntroductionInternational education has a heightened presence under processes and imaginaries of globalization. On the one hand there is the growing intensity of transnational flows and connections spawned by immigration and Internet technologies (Appadurai, 2006). Cultural difference is inherent within Western countries and educational systems must adapt. In some parts of Canada, multicultural education now seems out-of-step with the increasing diversity of experiences and identities of new immigrants. On the other hand, as national economies, transnational corporations and educational institutions compete globally, there is a demand for both citizens and immigrants to be 'globally competent' and transnationally connected. In this vein, 'internationalization' is a key strategic aim across Canadian universities and for universities in many other countries. Under reduced government funding, universities must become more entrepreneurial (Altbach & Knight, 2007). This expanded role further intensifies branding initiatives, competing for students, and partnering internationally. For many universities 'internationalizing' is motivated by being seen as 'world class' (Marginson, 2006) and as actively engaged in real-world issues and problems that transcend national boundaries.While these pragmatic or more financially motivated agendas may not themselves be centered on processes of teaching and learning, they create conditions whereby international education is more essential and highly valued. For one example, when universities are successful in attracting international students, they are then compelled to support these students with new initiatives such as: English language learning support, enhanced social services, cultural transition programs, and internationalized curricula. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it