MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166035320 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e318217e735

Increasing incidence of myasthenia gravis among elderly in British Columbia, Canada

2011· article· en· W2166035320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyasthenia gravisIncidence (geometry)MedicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presence of anti-acetylcholine receptor (anti-AChR) antibodies is highly specific for myasthenia gravis (MG). These antibodies are detected in 85%–95% of sera from patients with generalized MG and 40%–70% of patients with ocular MG.1 An increasing incidence of MG, especially in the elderly population, has been described in Japan, the United Kingdom, and Denmark.2,–,4 Recent studies have also focused on the epidemiology of anti-AChR antibody seropositivity as a surrogate marker of MG.4,–,6 The Neuro-Immunology Laboratory at the University of British Columbia is the sole laboratory in British Columbia (BC), Canada, offering anti-AChR antibody testing for clinical diagnosis. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence and epidemiologic characteristics of anti-AChR antibody seropositivity in BC and to examine changes in incidence over time. ### Methods. We performed a population-based study of the incidence of anti-AChR antibody-seropositivity in BC for the 25-year period of January 1, 1984, to December 31, 2008. Incident cases were ascertained by retrospectively identifying all first-time seropositive tests. A positive anti-AChR antibody test …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it