MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166123725 · doi:10.1038/nature12352

Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter

2013· article· en· W2166123725 on OpenAlexafffund
Christian Rinke, Patrick Schwientek, Alexander Sczyrba, Natalia Ivanova, Iain Anderson, Jan‐Fang Cheng, Aaron E. Darling, Stephanie Malfatti, Brandon K. Swan, Esther Gies, Jeremy A. Dodsworth, Brian P. Hedlund, Stefan M. Sievert, Wen‐Tso Liu, Jonathan A. Eisen, Steven Hallam, Nikos C. Kyrpides, Ramūnas Stepanauskas, Edward M. Rubin, Philip Hugenholtz, Tanja Woyke

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundAustralian Research CouncilJoint Genome InstituteTula FoundationCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTree of life (biology)BiologyMetagenomicsGenomePhylogeneticsGenomicsOrganismEvolutionary biologyArchaeaPhylumComputational biologyComparative genomicsPhylogenomicsEcologyGeneticsGeneClade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genome sequencing enhances our understanding of the biological world by providing blueprints for the evolutionary and functional diversity that shapes the biosphere. However, microbial genomes that are currently available are of limited phylogenetic breadth, owing to our historical inability to cultivate most microorganisms in the laboratory. We apply single-cell genomics to target and sequence 201 uncultivated archaeal and bacterial cells from nine diverse habitats belonging to 29 major mostly uncharted branches of the tree of life, so-called ‘microbial dark matter’. With this additional genomic information, we are able to resolve many intra- and inter-phylum-level relationships and to propose two new superphyla. We uncover unexpected metabolic features that extend our understanding of biology and challenge established boundaries between the three domains of life. These include a novel amino acid use for the opal stop codon, an archaeal-type purine synthesis in Bacteria and complete sigma factors in Archaea similar to those in Bacteria. The single-cell genomes also served to phylogenetically anchor up to 20% of metagenomic reads in some habitats, facilitating organism-level interpretation of ecosystem function. This study greatly expands the genomic representation of the tree of life and provides a systematic step towards a better understanding of biological evolution on our planet. Uncultivated archaeal and bacterial cells of major uncharted branches of the tree of life are targeted and sequenced using single-cell genomics; this enables resolution of many intra- and inter-phylum-level relationships, uncovers unexpected metabolic features that challenge established boundaries between the three domains of life, and leads to the proposal of two new superphyla. Currently available genome sequences give us a narrow view of the remarkable diversity of microorganisms because the vast majority of them have never been cultivated in pure culture. Here Tanja Woyke and colleagues use single-cell genomics to target and sequence 201 uncultivated archaeal and bacterial cells from nine diverse habitats. This information reveals numerous intra- and inter-phylum relationships and a number of unexpected metabolic features. On the basis of the new data the authors propose taxonomic revisions to the archaeal and bacterial domains, including a proposal to reorganizing the Archaea into three superphyla.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2,445
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207