MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Significados atribuídos ao uso de álcool e tabaco por profissionais de saúde

2013· article· pt· W2166308415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista gaúcha de enfermagem · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth, Drugs, and Violence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No processo de autoconhecimento do profissional de saúde para a melhoria da qualidade da assistência na Estratégia de Saúde da Família (ESF), torna-se importante a abordagem do significado atribuído ao uso de álcool e tabaco. Este estudo pretendeu compreender o significado atribuído ao próprio uso de álcool e tabaco por profissionais da ESF. Foi realizado um estudo qualitativo em cinco cidades de pequeno porte da Região Sul do Brasil entre março e maio de 2012. Foram realizadas observações diretas e entrevistas em profundidade com 39 sujeitos. A partir da análise de conteúdo, foram encontradas duas categorias centrais: "Faça o que eu digo mas não faça o que eu faço" e "Eu sou um exemplo de comportamento". Foi possível identificar que o profissional vivencia um processo interativo de ressignificação dos conceitos a respeito do próprio uso de substâncias psicoativas, que o levam a responder à expectativa social de ser modelo de comportamento.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it