QoS-Enabled Power Saving Access Points for IEEE 802.11e Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IEEE 802.11 is now being used in many situations where access point (AP) power saving would be highly desirable. Unfortunately, this is not possible since the existing standard requires that APs remain active at all times. In this paper, we present a framework for a power saving quality-of-service (QoS) enabled access point (PSQAP), intended for use in low power infrastructure applications. The proposed scheme introduces infrastructure based power saving while preserving the QoS requirements for delay and loss intolerant real-time applications. Using an extensive simulation study we have evaluated the integrated framework, which consists of a proposed energy efficient media access control (MAC) protocol and an adaptive connection admission control (CAC) scheme. Our results show that the power consumption at PSQAPs can be significantly reduced without violating any of the QoS requirements for real-time traffic streams. The effect on power saving at the stations is also reasonable and can be controlled via protocol specific parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it