MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166572019 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.1998.726538

A neural network approach to real-time path planning with safety consideration

2002· article· en· W2166572019 on OpenAlexaff
Max Q.‐H. Meng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkspaceComputer scienceRobotMotion planningArtificial neural networkTrajectoryPath (computing)Mobile robotState spaceLyapunov functionControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a neural network approach is proposed for real-time path planning of robots with safety consideration. The neural network is topologically organised, which is based on a previous biologically inspired model for dynamical trajectory generation of a mobile robot in a nonstationary environment. The state space of the neural network can be the joint space of multilink robot manipulators or the Cartesian workspace. This model is capable of dealing with multiple target problems as well. The target globally attracts the robot, while the obstacles push the robot away locally to avoid collisions. By taking into account of the clearance from obstacles, the planned "comfortable" path does not suffer either the "too close" or the "too far" problems. Each neuron has only local lateral connections. The optimal path is generated in real-time through the dynamics of the neural activity landscape without explicitly optimising any cost function. Therefore, it is computationally efficient. The stability of the network is guaranteed by the existence of a Lyapunov function. The effectiveness and efficiency are demonstrated through simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207