MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166612619 · doi:10.5194/npg-19-57-2012

Multiplicative cascade processes and information integration for predictive mapping

2012· article· en· W2166612619 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNonlinear processes in geophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsPosterior probabilityMultiplicative functionEvent (particle physics)MathematicsMultifractal systemConditional probabilityPoint processComputer scienceStatisticsData miningAlgorithmFractalBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This paper presents a new model proposed on the basis of multiplicative cascade process (MCP) theory for integrating spatial information to be used for mineral resources prediction and environmental impact assessment. Probability of a spatial point event is defined as the probability that a small map calculating unit (map unit) randomly selected from a study area contains one or more points. The probability that such unit randomly selected from a subarea with known spatial binary map patterns (evidential layers) contains one or more points is defined as the posterior point event probability. In this paper, processes of integrating multiple binary map patterns that divide the study area into smaller areas with updated posterior probabilities are viewed as multiplicative cascade processes resulting in a new log-linear model for calculating conditional probabilities from the multiple evidential input layers. The coefficients (weights) involved in this model measuring degree of spatial correlation between point event and the evidential layers are found to be associated with singularity indices involved in multifractal modeling. It is demonstrated that the model is simple and easy to be implemented in comparison with the existing weights of evidence model which is commonly applied in spatial decision modeling. In addition, the posterior probability as the end product of a multiplicative cascade process can be used to describe multifractality and singularity which are useful properties for characterizing spatial distribution of predicted point events. A case study of tin mineral potential mapping in the Gejiu mineral district in China is used to illustrate principles and use of the modeling process. Four binary layers: formation of limestone, buffer distance for intersections of three groups of faults, local and regional geochemical anomalies of elements As, Sn, Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd, were combined for mapping potential areas for occurrence of tin mineral deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it