MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166732168 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2010.2045817

Adaptive Region-Based Image Enhancement Method for Robust Face Recognition Under Variable Illumination Conditions

2010· article· en· W2166732168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionPreprocessorFace (sociological concept)Facial recognition systemHistogram equalizationHistogramPattern recognition (psychology)Contrast (vision)Adaptive histogram equalizationInvariant (physics)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variable illumination conditions, especially the side lighting effects in face images, form a main obstacle in face recognition systems. To deal with this problem, this paper presents a novel adaptive region-based image preprocessing scheme that enhances face images and facilitates the illumination invariant face recognition task. The proposed method first segments an image into different regions according to its different local illumination conditions, then both the contrast and the edges are enhanced regionally so as to alleviate the side lighting effect. Different from existing contrast enhancement methods, we apply the proposed adaptive region-based histogram equalization on the low-frequency coefficients to minimize illumination variations under different lighting conditions. Besides contrast enhancement, by observing that under poor illuminations the high-frequency features become more important in recognition, we propose enlarging the high-frequency coefficients to make face images more distinguishable. This procedure is called edge enhancement (EdgeE). The EdgeE is also region-based. Compared with existing image preprocessing methods, our method is shown to be more suitable for dealing with uneven illuminations in face images. Experimental results on the representative databases, the Yale B+Extended Yale B database and the Carnegie Mellon University-Pose, Illumination, and Expression database, show that the proposed method significantly improves the performance of face images with illumination variations. The proposed method does not require any modeling and model fitting steps and can be implemented easily. Moreover, it can be applied directly to any single image without using any lighting assumption, and any prior information on 3-D face geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it