MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2166814968 · doi:10.1109/ias.1989.96654

Radio frequency interference of electric motors and controls

2003· article· en· W2166814968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic interferenceCapacitive sensingInterference (communication)Electrical engineeringCommutatorRadio frequencyFerrite (magnet)Electric motorElectromagnetic compatibilityComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problems of RF interference (RFI) caused by electric motors used in appliances are discussed. Legal limits on RFI are briefly considered. Two methods for reducing RFI are examined at length: the use of proper design techniques, or suppression of the noise by using suppression components. Design factors discussed are the magnetic/electric ratio and the effects of commutator shift, brushes, and mechanics. The discussion of suppression techniques covers power-line filters, capacitive and inductive suppression, positioning of suppression components, ferrite bead suppression, and cable-handling techniques.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it