MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167200968 · doi:10.14785/lpsn-2015-0002

A prospective outcome study of patients with profound combined immunodeficiency (P-CID)

2015· article· en· W2167200968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLymphoSign Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProspective cohort studyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicinePrimary immunodeficiencyPediatricsTransplantationImmunodeficiencyObservational studyCohort studyImmune systemImmunologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a prospective outcome study of patients with profound combined immunodeficiency (P-CID) (study number DRKS00000497). Combined immunodeficiencies (CID) are a heterogeneous group of inherited immune disorders with impaired T-cell development and (or) function manifesting through increased susceptibility to infections and (or) immune dysregulation. They can be delineated from severe CID (SCID) by their manifestation beyond the first year of life. Profound CID (P-CID) is a potentially life-threatening form of CID, in which stem cell transplant (SCT) is a relevant consideration at diagnosis. The primary objective of the study is to provide natural history data on patients with P-CID, irrespective of whether they undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or not. The goals are to determine survival, the frequency of severe events, and quality of life (QOL) 5 years after study inclusion. The secondary objective is to develop a risk model for P-CID patients. The model is developed from a set of clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at diagnosis, at study inclusion, and yearly thereafter. The tertiary objectives of this study are to determine the effects of donor, recipient, and treatment factors on the outcome of HSCT. The goal is to determine the quality of engraftment and immunological reconstitution and to determine the effects of these parameters on clinical outcome. The main hypothesis is that P-CID patients undergoing early HSCT have a better 5-year survival rate than patients who undergo late HSCT or are not transplanted. This is a prospective multi-centre international cohort study (observational study). Enrolled patients will be evaluated and treated according to local institutional protocols. They will receive comparable baseline and follow-up evaluations across all participating centres, irrespective of the therapeutic strategy at the individual site. There will be at least 6 study visits (scheduled yearly) for all patients. Because of the variable history prior to study inclusion, a morbidity score is determined for each patient at study visit 1. For those patients undergoing HSCT, an additional 6 month post-HSCT visit will be scheduled. The study visits will document immunological parameters, severe events including major infections, and major manifestations of immune dysregulation, severe transplant-related events, and QOL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it