MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167215358 · doi:10.1002/esp.520

Simulation and measurement of surface shear stress over isolated and closely spaced transverse dunes in a wind tunnel

2003· article· en· W2167215358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Surface Processes and Landforms · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAeolian processes and effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyShear stressGeomorphologyBeach morphodynamicsSediment transportAeolian processesTurbulenceShear (geology)Wind tunnelGeotechnical engineeringCrestIntermittencySedimentMechanicsPhysicsPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Topographic interactions generate multidirectional and unsteady airflow that limits the application of velocity profile approaches for estimating sediment transport over dunes. Results are presented from a series of wind tunnel simulations using Irwin‐type surface‐mounted pressure sensors to measure shear stress variability directly at the surface over both isolated and closely spaced sharp‐crested model dunes. Findings complement existing theories on secondary airflow effects on stoss transport dynamics and provide new information on the influence of lee‐side airflow patterns on dune morphodynamics. For all speeds investigated, turbulent unsteadiness at the dune toe indicates a greater, more variable surface shear, despite a significant drop in time‐averaged measurements of streamwise shear stress at this location. This effect is believed sufficient to inhibit sediment deposition at the toe and may be responsible for documented intermittency in sand transport in the toe region. On the stoss slope, streamline compression and flow acceleration cause an increase in flow steadiness and shear stress to a maximum at the crest that is double that at the toe of the isolated dune and 60–70 per cent greater than at flow reattachment on the lower stoss of closely spaced dunes. Streamwise flow accelerations, rather than turbulence, have greater influence on stress generation on the stoss and this effect increases with stoss slope distance and with incident wind speed. Reversed flow within the separation cell generates significant surface shear (30–40 per cent of maximum values) for both spacings. This supports field studies that suggest reversed flow is competent enough to return sediment to the dune directly or in a deflected direction. High variability in shear at reattachment indicates impact of a turbulent shear layer that, despite low values of time‐averaged streamwise stress in this region, would inhibit sediment accumulation. Downwind of reattachment, shear stress and flow steadiness increase within 6 h ( h = dune height) of reattachment and approach upwind values by 25 h . A distance of at least 30 h is suggested for full boundary layer recovery, which is comparable to fluvial estimates. The Irwin sensor used in this study provides a reliable means to measure skin friction force responsible for sand transport and its robust, simple, and cost‐effective design shows promise for validating these findings in natural dune settings. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it