MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167361320 · doi:10.1112/s0024610700001332

Estimates for Fundamental Solutions of Second-Order Parabolic Equations

2000· article· en· W2167361320 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the London Mathematical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Parabolic partial differential equationMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPartial differential equationEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the second-order parabolic equation ċċċ∂tu⁡(t,x)=∇ċa⁡(t,x)ċ∇u⁡(t,x)-b⁡(t,x)ċ∇u⁡(t,x)+∇b∩⁡(t,x)⁢u⁡(t,x)⁢u⁡(t,x)+V⁡(t,x)⁢(1) in a domain [0,T]×Rd ⊂ Rd+1, where a=(ai⁢j)i,j=1d is matrix of bounded measurable coefficients, b=(bj)j=1d, and b^=(b^j)j=1d are measurable (in general, singular) vector fields, V is a measurable potential, T is a fixed positive number, and ∂tu = ∂u/∂t, and we employ the notation ċċċ∇ċaċ∇u=∑i,j=1d∂xiai⁢j∂xju,bċ∇u=∑j=1dbj∂xju,∇b∩⁢u=⁢∑j=1d∂xj(b∩j⁢u). We introduce a new class of coefficients in the lower-order terms for which we prove the existence and the uniqueness of the weak fundamental solution, and for this we derive Gaussian upper and lower bounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it