MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167547054 · doi:10.4310/pamq.2005.v1.n4.a8

A Conjecture about the Analytical Behaviour of Eisenstein Series

2005· article· en· W2167547054 on OpenAlexaff
Bill Casselman

Bibliographic record

VenuePure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureQuotientEisenstein seriesCompleteness (order theory)Algebra over a fieldPure mathematicsResidualSpace (punctuation)Mathematical analysisModular form

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper will formulate and offer evidence for a conjecture on the analytical behaviour of residual Eisenstein series in the positive Weyl chamber. It should play a major role in an also conjectural Paley-Wiener theorem about the Schwartz space of arithmetic quotients. If things work out as I expect, this development should be logically independent of Chapter 7 of [Langlands:1976], and in the end one should obtain a new proof of Langlands ’ completeness theorem. Suppose G to be the group of real points on a reductive group defined over Q and further set Γ an arithmetic subgroup of G K a maximal compact subgroup of G ZG the centre of G For a rational parabolic subgroup P, set N = NP its unipotent radical M =MP its reductive quotient P/NP ΓM the image of Γ ∩ P in M AP the maximal Q-split torus in M δP its modulus character detAdn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePure and Applied Mathematics QuarterlySame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207