MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2167784001 · doi:10.1184/r1/6475760

Hierarchical Latent Dictionaries for Models of Brain Activation

2018· article· en· W2167784001 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaW. M. Keck FoundationNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceMagnetoencephalographyLeverage (statistics)Artificial intelligenceRedundancy (engineering)CovarianceHierarchical database modelPattern recognition (psychology)Natural language processingSpeech recognitionMachine learningData miningMathematicsElectroencephalographyStatisticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we propose a hierarchical latent dictionary approach to estimate the timevarying mean and covariance of a process for which we have only limited noisy samples. We fully leverage the limited sample size and redundancy in sensor measurements by transferring knowledge through a hierarchy of lower dimensional latent processes. As a case study, we utilize Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings of brain activity to identify the word being viewed by a human subject. Specifically, we identify the word category for a single noisy MEG recording, when only given limited noisy samples on which to train.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it