MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168061825 · doi:10.1080/10618560410001729108

Effect of reaction order on stability of planar detonation waves

2004· article· en· W2168061825 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of computational fluid dynamics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignKillam Trusts
KeywordsDetonationLinear stabilityWavelengthInstabilityComputationStability (learning theory)Arrhenius equationPlanarNumerical analysisMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsExplosive materialChemistryOpticsKinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the multi-dimensional linear and non-linear stability of planar detonation waves for one-step Arrhenius rate with arbitrary reaction order. A normal mode analysis with an iterative shooting method is used in linear stability. Results show that the effect of decreasing the reaction order is roughly equivalent to increasing the activation energy, or decreasing the heat release and overdrive. Both the one- and two-dimensional linear stability spectra consist of a larger number of unstable modes at lower reaction order. Bifurcation to non-oscillatory modes occurs at slightly lower activation energy or higher heat release and overdrive for lower reaction order. Thus overall, a lower reaction order results in more unstable waves. Numerical simulations, using a Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory scheme, show that activation energy has a stronger effect on cell regularity than the reaction order. It has been suggested that a relationship may exist between transverse wavelength from multi-dimensional linear stability analysis and cell sizes. Our computations confirm previous numerical results that show that the most unstable transverse wavelengths from linear stability analysis are comparable with the minimum channel width in which one full cell is observed in numerical simulations. Wider computations show that cells, which appear regular and periodic in narrow channel computations, become irregular. The average cell size approaches a consistent limit corresponding to an even larger size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it