THE LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS AND THE LAW OF THE ITERATED LOGARITHM FOR INFINITE DIMENSIONAL INTERACTING DIFFUSION PROCESSES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The classical Dirichlet form given by the intrinsic gradient on Γ ℝ d is associated with a Markov process consisting of a countable family of interacting diffusions. By considering each diffusion as a particle with unit mass, the randomly evolving configuration can be thought of as a Radon measure valued diffusion. The quasi-sure analysis of Dirichlet forms is used to find exceptional sets of configurations for this Markov process. We consider large scale properties of the configuration and show that, for quite general measures, the process never hits those unusual configurations that violate the law of large numbers. Furthermore, for certain Gibbs measures, which model random particles in ℝ d that interact via a potential function, we show, for d=1, 2, that the process never hits those unusual configurations that violate the law of the iterated logarithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it