MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168337246 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434388

Decentralized adaptation in sensor networks: Analysis and application of regret-based algorithms

2007· article· en· W2168337246 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Bandit Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegretWireless sensor networkComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Class (philosophy)Correlated equilibriumMatching (statistics)Set (abstract data type)Distributed computingScheme (mathematics)Adaptation (eye)Game theoryAlgorithmReal-time computingComputer networkRepeated gameArtificial intelligenceMathematicsMachine learningEquilibrium selection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a class of decentralized, game theoretic adaptive algorithms which can be deployed to manage sensor activities with low coordination overhead. This class includes traditional game theoretic algorithms such as fictitious play as well as new dynamically adaptive regret matching algorithms, which allow sensors to track a competitively optimal (correlated equilibrium) set of behaviour as it evolves in time. Two applications are given, to a ZigBee-enabled unattended ground sensor network for intruder monitoring, and to a dynamic spectrum allocation scheme for wireless sensor communication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207