MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168358431 · doi:10.1109/antem.2010.5552469

Thin phase-correcting lens antennas made using a three-layer phase-shifting surface (PSS) at Ka band

2010· article· en· W2168358431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLens (geology)OpticsPhase (matter)Antenna (radio)Materials scienceFabricationKa bandDirectional antennaDielectricOptoelectronicsComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design, fabrication, and measurement of three phase-correcting lens antennas made using an electrically thin three-layer phase-shifting surface (PSS). The three phase-correction schemes realised using the PSS are the 90 degree, 45 degree and quasi-continuous cases. These lenses, which present identical cost, size and weight, are compared in terms of their far-field performance. It is shown that decreasing the size of the phase steps used in the phase-correction scheme improves the performance of the PSS lenses. As a reference to conventional designs, the performance of a dielectric plano-hyperbolic lens antenna is also presented. The performance of the PSS lenses are as good as, or better, than this conventional dielectric lens antenna within a specific operating band, over which they also offer a significant reduction in weight, thickness and cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it