The Influence of Relational Bonds and Innovative Marketing on Consumer Perception – A Study of Theme Parks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased prosperity has made quality of life and entertainment greater priorities, creating fierce competition among recreation industries. Apart from pursuing innovation, businesses must establish strong relational bonds with their customers to maintain their competitive edge. Using theme parks as a case study, we researched and modelled the relationships among relational bonds, innovative marketing, perceived value, satisfaction, trust and loyalty. A consumer survey returned 803 valid questionnaires and revealed the following: (1) Relational bonds with customers have a significantly positive effect on their perceived value and satisfaction. (2) Innovative marketing has a significantly positive influence on customer perceived value. Consumers were categorized by their visit frequency (high, moderate, or low) and compared by group. Results showed the most significant difference between moderately frequent and infrequent visitors in relation to the influence of trust on loyalty. The results can serve as reference for companies in implementing customer relations and innovative marketing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it