MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168367439 · doi:10.1109/ismvl.1995.513507

Reed-Muller forms for incompletely specified functions via sparse polynomial interpolation

2002· article· en· W2168367439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)PolynomialFinite fieldBinary numberPolynomial interpolationApplied mathematicsMathematicsField (mathematics)AlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical optimizationDiscrete mathematicsLinear interpolationPure mathematicsArithmeticArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate the possibility of exploiting incompletely specified functions for the purpose of minimizing Reed-Muller (RM) forms. All the previous work in this area has been based on exhaustive search for the optimal solution, or on some approximations to it. Here we show that an alternative approach can bring better results: the definition of the MVL RM transforms as a polynomial interpolation over a finite field allows us to use the methods for sparse polynomial interpolation to find good approximations to the optimal solution. Starting from the general MVL case, we derive a computationally efficient algorithm for computing RM transforms for binary functions as well. We show empirically that the new method performs better than all known methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.564

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207