Shell Characteristics of Eggs from Historic Strains of Single Comb White Leghorn Chickens and the Relationship of Egg Shape to Shell Strength
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of long term genetic selection on shell characteristics was determined by analyzing eggs acquired from Agriculture Canada: Ottawa Control Strain 5, from a 1950 base population; 7, from a 1959 population; and 10, from a 1972 population. H&N "Nick Chick" 1993 commercial strain was also included because it shares genetic ancestry with the three historic strains. Eggs were collected beginning at 28 wk of age, then every 4 wk through the end of the study at 86 wk of the laying cycle and egg weight, egg height, egg width, shell weight, shell thickness, egg specific gravity, and shell breaking force measured. The relationship of egg shape and weight as factors affecting shell strength were also investigated. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were found between strains for egg shape and a progressive increase in weight and surface area of eggs from the 1950 strain to the current strain. The shape index indicates that the current strain has increased egg size with the greatest increase seen in egg width. The mean breaking force of eggs from the current strain was higher (P< 0.05) than the other strain`s eggs with no strain differences in percent shell weight, shell thickness, or specific gravity. A decline in breaking force, percent shell weight, and specific gravity was observed among all the strains over the production period. The results from this study suggest that genetic selection has produced larger eggs that are rounder in shape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".