MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168487037 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0165

On the reliability of earth slopes in three dimensions

2009· article· en· W2168487037 on OpenAlexaff
D. V. Griffiths, Jinsong Huang, Gordon A. Fenton

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom fieldFinite element methodVariance reductionMonte Carlo methodProbabilistic logicContext (archaeology)MathematicsReliability (semiconductor)Statistical physicsPlane (geometry)Applied mathematicsVariance (accounting)Mathematical optimizationGeometryStatisticsStructural engineeringGeologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper investigates the probability of failure of two-dimensional and three-dimensional slopes using the random finite-element method (RFEM). In this context, RFEM combines elastoplastic finite-element algorithms with random field theory in a Monte Carlo framework. Full account is taken of local averaging and variance reduction over each element, and an exponentially decaying (Markov) spatial correlation function is incorporated. It is found that two-dimensional probabilistic analysis, which implicitly assumes perfect spatial correlation in the out-of-plane direction, may underestimate the probability of failure of slopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207