MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168560377 · doi:10.1109/robot.1992.220264

A guidance control scheme for accurate track following of AGVs

2003· article· en· W2168560377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrack (disk drive)Tracking (education)Computer scienceMinificationFront (military)Position (finance)Computer visionScheme (mathematics)Orientation (vector space)TrajectoryArtificial intelligenceControl (management)SimulationControl theory (sociology)EngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present a guidance scheme that provides accurate tracking and faster minimization of tracking errors of the front and rear ends of automatic guided vehicles (AGVs). Sensors provided at the front and rear provide the position and orientation of the front and rear ends of the vehicle relative to the track. Control laws that make use of this information have been devised to speedily achieve accurate tracking of the front and rear ends of the vehicle with minimum overshoots. The control laws are chosen based on the presence or absence of curvature and also based on the relative location of the longitudinal axis of the vehicle relative to the track. The gains are modified online to achieve proper tracking. Simulation results are provided for illustration.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207