MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168636007 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2005.863253

The complementary derivatives method: a second-order accurate interpolation scheme for non-uniform grid in FDTD simulation

2006· article· en· W2168636007 on OpenAlexaff
M.H. Kermani, Omar M. Ramahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodGridInterpolation (computer graphics)Truncation errorModel order reductionTruncation (statistics)Computer scienceBoundary (topology)Finite difference methodBoundary value problemReduction (mathematics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Computational complexity theoryResonatorComputational scienceAlgorithmMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryOpticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-uniform grid in finite-difference time-domain methods, which is typically used to resolve fine structures, can reduce the computational domain and therefore lead to a reduction of the computational cost. However, for high-accuracy problems, such as partially-filled parallel plate waveguide and resonators, using different grid size increases the truncation error at the boundary of domains having different grid size. To address this problem, in this work, we introduce the complementary derivatives method (CDM). Theoretical discussion and numerical results will be presented to show that the CDM can maintain second-order accuracy throughout the computational domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components LettersSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207