MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168636007 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2005.863253

The complementary derivatives method: a second-order accurate interpolation scheme for non-uniform grid in FDTD simulation

2006· article· en· W2168636007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodGridInterpolation (computer graphics)Truncation errorModel order reductionTruncation (statistics)Computer scienceBoundary (topology)Finite difference methodBoundary value problemReduction (mathematics)Domain (mathematical analysis)Computational complexity theoryResonatorComputational scienceAlgorithmMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryOpticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-uniform grid in finite-difference time-domain methods, which is typically used to resolve fine structures, can reduce the computational domain and therefore lead to a reduction of the computational cost. However, for high-accuracy problems, such as partially-filled parallel plate waveguide and resonators, using different grid size increases the truncation error at the boundary of domains having different grid size. To address this problem, in this work, we introduce the complementary derivatives method (CDM). Theoretical discussion and numerical results will be presented to show that the CDM can maintain second-order accuracy throughout the computational domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it