MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W216867159

Empirical Study of Integrated EVA Performance Measurement in China1/ÉTUDE EMPIRIQUE SUR EVA INTÉGRÉE DE MESURE DU RENDEMENT EN CHINE

2008· article· fr· W216867159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicEvaluation and Optimization Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic Value AddedHumanitiesWelfare economicsProfit (economics)EconomicsPhilosophyMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Traditional performance measurement has some limitations. Economic Value Added (EVA) is a real method to measure the company's true value. This paper discussed on how to improve traditional performance measurement with EVA. It presented the integrated EVA performance measurement (IEPM) model. The superiority of IEPM model to traditional performance measurement was empirically analyzed with BP neural network and the data from China's listed companies. The results showed that the measurement ability of IEPM model was superior to that of traditional performance measurement. Its prediction ability was also proved to be better than that of traditional measurement. It suggests that introducing EVA to performance measurement well reflects the company's real profit. So it is effective and reasonable to use IEPM model to evaluate and predict the company's performance. Key words: Economic value added, IEPM model, Neural network, Performance measurement Resume: Traditionnels de mesure du rendement a quelques limitations. Economic Value Added (EVA) est une vraie methode pour mesurer la vraie valeur de l'entreprise. Ce document discute sur la maniere d'ameliorer la mesure du rendement traditionnel avec EVA. Il a presente les mesures de la performance integree EVA (IEPM) modele. La superiorite de l'IEPM modele traditionnel de la mesure du rendement a ete empiriquement analysees avec BP de reseaux de neurones et les donnees provenant de la Chine societes cotees. Les resultats ont montre que la mesure de la capacite IEPM modele a ete superieure a celle de la traditionnelle mesure de la performance. Sa capacite de prevision a egalement ete revelee meilleure que celle de la mesure traditionnelle. Il suggere que l'introduction de l'EVA a la mesure du rendement reflete bien la societe profit immobilier. Ainsi, il est efficace et raisonnable d'utiliser IEPM modele pour evaluer et prevoir les resultats de la societe. Mots-Cles: Economic value added, IEPM modele, Neural network, Mesure de la performance (ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.) 1. INTRODUCTION Performance measurement is a very important factor for solving agency problem. The performance measurement system used in China usually relies on traditional accounting measures. It measures the company's performance from such aspects as accounting profit, assets operation ability, debt paying ability, and growth ability. Traditional accounting measures are easy to be quantized and the data are also easy to be obtained. But there are still some problems With traditional performance measurement. First, its evaluation indices are mainly from the Company's financial report based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Many kinds of preparations, goodwill, deferred taxes and some other items are deduced directly from the income account. So the legal capital is considered to be reduced and some unnecessary financing or investment behavior occurs. Second, debt cost has been reflected in traditional performance measurement, but capital cost is not yet. So the cost calculation is not exact. It couldn't reflect the investors' required minimum attractive rate of return. Third, performance measurement system used in China mostly relies on subjective weighting method. The weights may be influenced by some subjective factors. So the inherent relationships of evaluation indices may be distorted and the results could not reflect the company's real performance. Last, the interests of manager and shareholder couldn't be unified effectively. So manager may pay more attention to short-term achievements and give up those projects that will be good for company's long-term development while may have some negative influence on current profit. The company's future development would also be influenced. In order to solve the problem, we need performance measures, which could well reflect the shareholder's interest. Economic value added (EVA) is such a method that is viewed as an effective measure reflecting both the value of company and the interest of shareholder4. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it