Optimal relay station placement in IEEE 802.16j networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To make the WiMAX Point-to-Multi-Point (PMP) systems more competitive and applicable to the future metropolitan area networking scenarios, deploying relay stations (RSs) as defined in IEEE 802.16j has been considered a promising solution that can replace the 802.16e mesh mode for coverage extension and throughput enhancement. In this paper, we are committed to tackle the task of RS placement and relay time allocation in IEEE 802.16j Mobile Multi-hop Relay (MMR) networks, in order to meet the uneven distributed traffic demand of each subscriber station (SS) as well as the thirst for system capacity. By incorporating advanced cooperative relaying technology such as Decode-Forward (D-F) or Compress-Forward (C-F), the task of RS placement and relay time allocation is formulated into an optimization problem, aiming at finding the optimal location of a single RS and the resource allocation for all the SSs. Numerical analysis is conducted through a number of case studies to demonstrate the performance gain by using the proposed approach for relay placement and relay time allocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".