MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2168901237 · doi:10.1109/mdt.2004.34

Jitter models for the design and test of Gbps-speed serial interconnects

2004· article· en· W2168901237 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Design & Test of Computers · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsJitterBit error rateComputer scienceGigabitSerial communicationNoise (video)Electronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a comprehensive analysis of jitter causes and types, and develops accurate jitter models for design and test of high-speed interconnects. The recent deployment of gigabit-per-second (Gbps) serial I/O interconnects aims at overcoming data transfer bottlenecks resulting from the limited ability to increase chip pin counts in parallel bus architectures. The traditional measure of a communication link's performance has been its associated bit error rate (BER), which is the ratio of the number of bits received in error to the total number of bits transmitted. When data rates increase, jitter magnitude and signal amplitude noise must decrease to maintain the same BER. As data rates exceed 1 Gbps, a slight increase in jitter or amplitude noise has a far greater effect on the BER.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it