O-raffinose-polymerised haemoglobin. A biochemical and pharmacological profile of an oxygen carrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Haemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) represent an interesting class of blood substitutes which are undergoing advanced clinical trials. The therapeutic goal of these compounds is to avoid or reduce blood transfusion in different surgical and medical situations of acute haemoglobin deficiency. Their main advantages include availability in large volumes, storage for prolonged periods, rapid administration (without typing and cross matching) and sterilisation by pasteurisation. Their main known disadvantages are reduced circulation half-life, haemodynamic and gastrointestinal perturbations, probably related to nitric oxide (NO) scavenging, free radical induction, and alterations of biochemical and haematological parameters (increases in liver enzymes levels, platelet aggregation). Cell-free o-raffinose cross-linked and oligomerised human haemoglobin (O-r-poly-Hb) (Hemolink, Hemosol, Canada) is a modified haemoglobin with molecular weight ranging from 32- > 500 kDa. Its affinity for oxygen appears lower than normal blood and an n (Hill coefficient) value of about 1 indicates a very low degree of co-operativity. Probably related to the low O2 affinity value and to the high molecular weight, O-r-poly-Hb has been shown to induce lesser haemodynamic perturbations than other first generation modified haemoglobins. This HBOC is in Phase III clinical trials in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery for perioperative haemodilution, at doses from 25 g (250 ml)-100 g (1000 ml).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".