MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169062014 · doi:10.1142/s0219455410003932

FE-PML MODELING OF 3D SCATTERING OF TRANSIENT ELASTIC WAVES IN CRACKED PLATE WITH RECTANGULAR CROSS SECTION

2010· article· en· W2169062014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Perfectly matched layerCross section (physics)ScatteringFinite element methodPolygon meshNondestructive testingStructural engineeringSquare (algebra)Materials scienceAcousticsMechanicsOpticsMathematical analysisGeometryPhysicsMathematicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a finite-element (FE) and perfectly matched layer (PML)modeling of three-dimensional (3D) scattering of transient elastic waves in a cracked infinite plate with rectangular cross-section. The FE predictions are validated against 3D semi-analytical literature results. The effects of PML parameters on a root-mean-square error estimate are measured against the reference FE predictions computed using extended meshes. The proposed model is shown, through the numerical examples, to offer huge saving in real run-time at a slight degradation in accuracy. Practical applications indicate its potential in modeling elastic-wave-based nondestructive evaluation of engineering structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it