MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169286256 · doi:10.1109/tsm.2010.2080693

Statistical Design Framework of Submicron Flip-Flop Circuits Considering Process Variations

2010· article· en· W2169286256 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlip-flopElectronic engineeringTransistorFLOPSElectronic circuitCircuit designProcess (computing)Leakage (economics)EngineeringVoltageTransistor countIntegrated circuit designComputer scienceElectrical engineeringParallel computingCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a framework for the statistical design of the flip-flops circuits is proposed to achieve a high yield, while meeting the performance, leakage power, switching power, and layout area design specifications. The proposed design solution provides the nominal design parameters, i.e., the widths and lengths of the flip-flop transistors, which provide maximum immunity to the process variations in the transistor dimensions and threshold voltage. The proposed framework shows that for a given flip-flop design specifications, a certain yield can be achieved. To further increase this yield, the proposed framework shows which design specifications should be relaxed. The transmission gate-based master-slave flip-flop is selected as a design case study in this paper, however, the proposed framework is applicable to any other flip-flop circuit in the nanometer regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it