MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169405799 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2007.903826

High-Order Finite-Element Methods for the Computation of Bending Loss in Optical Waveguides

2007· article· en· W2169405799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodIntegrated opticsOpticsComputationBendingMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to develop high-order vectorial finite-element methods to characterize the bending loss in optical waveguides. In order to avoid the use of approximate models based on equivalent refraction index or conformal mapping, the fully vectorial Maxwell system is expressed in a general orthogonal coordinate system. Boundary reflections are circumvented by a proper adaptation of the perfectly matched layer technique. Application to bent rib optical waveguides in cylindrical coordinates and bent circular fiber in toroidal coordinates is presented. In the latter case, a suitable family of quadrangular finite elements has been developed and was shown to give interesting results, both in that situation and in the Cartesian coordinate situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it