Functions of E-Government: A Study of Municipal Practices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
nologies by government. E-government is part of a bigger movement toward public sector reform, which is driven by technol ogy and information systems. Technology has the potential to take government in new directions and transform governance (M?lki?, Anttiroiko, and Savolainen 2004), and many examples continue to arise reflecting this transformation. The majority of e-govern ment research has focused on highly popu lated municipalities and practices at the state and federal levels. The findings of the study presented here contribute to the research on e-government by highlighting the practices and trends in municipalities with populations of fewer than 50,000 residents. A 2005 survey of New Jersey municipalities was conducted to identify e-government practices and chief ad ministrative officers' perceptions of the use of technology within a framework of four distinct functions of e-government: e-organization, e services, e-partnering, and e-democracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it