MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169679846 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.808078

Error concealment methods, a comparative study

2003· article· en· W2169679846 on OpenAlexaff
Shahram Shirani, F. Kossentini, Rabab Ward

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceError concealmentImage (mathematics)Block (permutation group theory)A priori and a posterioriTransmission (telecommunications)PixelArtificial intelligenceImage restorationData lossComputer visionError detection and correctionData compressionAlgorithmImage processingDecoding methodsMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A serious problem that arises in transmission of compressed image and video data over band-limited channels is due to the fact that the encoded bit stream is vulnerable to transmission errors. This may cause the loss of blocks of data. Error concealment methods intend to conceal the effects of data block loss by restoring the lost information. Restoration of lost pixels in an image or video is known to be an ill-posed problem. Error concealment methods solve this problem by introducing assumptions. Different researchers have made different assumptions about the image and video signals. Depending on these assumptions or how they are interpreted, different concealment methods have been proposed. In this paper, we report on the different error concealment methods suggested in the literature and compare their a-priori assumptions, performances and complexities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207