MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2169712947 · doi:10.14430/arctic866

Variability of Arctic Sea Ice: The View from Space, An 18-year Record

2000· article· en· W2169712947 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Claire L. Parkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packOceanographyAntarctic sea iceArctic sea ice declineCryosphereBaySea ice concentrationGeologyClimatologyDrift iceArcticSea ice thickness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recently compiled 18-year record (1979 to 1996) of sea ice concentrations derived from four passive-microwave satellite instruments has allowed the quantification of a variety of measures of Arctic sea ice variability. Earlier maps generated using data through August 1987 have been updated to 18-year summaries of the annual range of sea ice distributions, the interannual variability of average monthly sea ice distributions, the frequency of sea ice coverage over the 18 years, the length of the sea ice season, and trends in the length of the sea ice season. Linear least squares trends over the 18-year record show the sea ice season to have lengthened over some sizeable regions, especially in the Bering Sea, Baffin Bay, Davis Strait, the Labrador Sea, and the Gulf of St. Lawrence, but to have shortened over a much larger area, including the Sea of Okhotsk, the Greenland Sea, the Barents Sea, and all the seas along the north coast of Russia. The area with trends showing sea ice seasons shortening by over 0.5 days/year is 7 500 000 km², over 2.5 times the area experiencing a lengthening of the sea ice season by over 0.5 days/year. Neither the shortening nor the lengthening, however, is uniform or monotonic over the 18-year record. Instead, the ice cover exhibits widespread interannual variability, not just in the length of the sea ice season but for each month-a fact well illustrated by the monthly average September ice coverage, which was at its lowest extent in 1995 but at its second highest one year later, in the final year of the record. The maps of ice frequency and ice variability can help identify how anomalous individual years are. In some cases, they can help forestall unnecessary concern over seemingly unusual conditions which, upon examination of the maps, are found to fall well within the observed variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207