GuruMine: A Pattern Mining System for Discovering Leaders and Tribes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this demo we introduce GuruMine, a pattern mining system for the discovery of leaders, i.e., influential users in social networks, and their tribes, i.e., a set of users usually influenced by the same leader over several actions. GuruMine is built upon a novel pattern mining framework for leaders discovery, that we introduced. In particular, we consider social networks where users perform actions. Actions may be as simple as tagging resources (URLS) as in del.icio.us, rating songs as in Yahoo! Music, or movies as in Yahoo! Movies, or users buying gadgets such as cameras, handholds, etc. and blogging a review on the gadgets. The assumption is that actions performed by a user can be seen by their network friends. Users seeing their friends actions are sometimes tempted to perform those actions. On the basis of the propagation of such influence, we provided various notion of leaders and developed algorithms for their efficient discovery. GuruMine provides users with a friendly graphical interface for selecting the actions of interest, and the kind of leaders to mine. The set of parameters driving the pattern discovery process can be iteratively refined, and the result is updated, if possible without incurring a completely new computation. Once a set of leaders has been extracted, GuruMine can easily validate them on a set of actions unseen during the pattern mining, by analyzing the portion of network reached by the influence of the selected leaders on the unseen actions. GuruMine also offers various visualizations over the social networks: the propagation of an action, the leaders, their tribes, and the interactions between different leaders and tribes. In this demo we will show: (i) how the pattern mining process can be driven towards the discovery of a good set of leaders, (ii) the ease of use of GuruMine system, and (iii) its outstanding performances on large real-world social networks and actions databases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".