Estimating overpressures in pole-type distribution transformers. II. Prediction tools
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-impedance faults are difficult to contain from the point of view of cover retention and tank rupture in pole-type distribution transformers. When evaluating a transformer's containment capabilities, one needs to consider two aspects: the overpressure caused by an arc of given parameters and the pressure withstand of the tank. This paper presents two methods to calculate overpressures as a function of the arc and all of the relevant geometrical parameters: tank diameter, air-space height, and the depth of the arc below the oil. Both methods have been validated with experiments. Results of tests to determine the pressure withstand of typical tanks are presented. It was found that an average value of the overpressure withstand capability is approximately 100 kPa. For a given tank geometry and fault parameters, a current-limiting fuse would be required if the methods proposed here predict an overpressure of more than 100 kPa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it