MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170735098 · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2011.93

Foundations for Highly Available Content-Based Publish/Subscribe Overlays

2011· article· en· W2170735098 on OpenAlexaff
Young Yoon, Vinod Muthusamy, Hans‐Arno Jacobsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverlayComputer scienceScalabilityOverlay networkDistributed computingOverhead (engineering)Computer networkPublicationVariety (cybernetics)Set (abstract data type)Overlay multicastOperating systemMulticastThe InternetProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Content-based publish/subscribe overlays offer a scalable messaging substrate for various event-based distributed systems. In an enterprise environment where service level agreements(SLAs) are strictly enforced, maintaining high availability and efficiency of the broker overlay is critical. To support these requirements, a set of three primitive operations are proposed to allow arbitrary transformations of an overlay to an optima lone, and two additional primitives are developed to enable ondemand adjustments when there are permanent or transient failures. Both sets of primitive operations minimize disruption by preserving message delivery guarantees even as the overlay topology changes, requiring no overhead when the overlay is not being modified, operating on a fixed neighborhood of brokers regardless of the size of the overlay, and completing quickly under a variety of conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207