MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170745653 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2005.1517067

Passive model order reduction for interconnect networks with large number of ports

2005· article· en· W2170745653 on OpenAlexaff
Min Ma, Roni Khazaka

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)InterconnectionComputer scienceModel order reductionParametric statisticsOrder (exchange)Electronic engineeringMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method of model order reduction (MOR) for linear interconnect systems with large numbers of output ports. Model order reduction techniques have proven to be very effective for the simulation of large interconnect networks. However, using current MOR techniques, the size of the reduced system grows rapidly as the number of ports increase. This leads to a severe reduction in efficiency. In this paper, a reduction method is proposed, which is based on imposing practical restrictions on the loads that can be connected to the ports of the network. By exploiting the information on the output ports and utilizing parametric model order reduction techniques, the resulting reduced model is much less sensitive to the number of ports and therefore is significantly smaller than standard reduced models. Examples are presented that demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the new method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005.Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207